Peer reviewed2019San Francisco

The Effects of Rent Control Expansion on Tenants, Landlords, and Inequality

Diamond, McQuade & Qian

Main finding

Rent control increased stability for covered tenants, while affected landlords converted or redeveloped buildings and reduced the regulated rental supply.

Covered tenants were 10–20% more likely to remain; treated rental supply fell 15%

Most important limitation

The often-cited 5.1% citywide rent increase is a structural-model estimate, not the direct reduced-form rent coefficient, and the policy is specific to San Francisco.

From the publication

Inspect the authors' figure directly

Figure from the paper

Figures 1a and 6a · Tenant and landlord responses

The paper separately traces covered tenants staying longer and renters leaving treated buildings.

Published chart showing the rent-control treatment effect on covered tenants staying at the same address over time.Figure 1a · Tenant stability
Published chart showing the treatment effect on renters remaining in rent-controlled buildings over time.Figure 6a · Rental supply response

Source: Diamond, McQuade & Qian (2019), Figures 1a and 6a; PDF pp. 39 and 44.

Read carefully: These are separate tenant and landlord outcomes, not one net welfare measure. The charts retain the authors’ original outcome definitions.

How this study is used

Claims this evidence supports

Strong evidenceRent control can protect covered tenants while shrinking the rental supply.See the full evidence stack →

Reference

Diamond, McQuade & Qian (2019). “The Effects of Rent Control Expansion on Tenants, Landlords, and Inequality.”

Open publisher or paper (opens in a new tab)